wikipedia.org — reviews, registry checks and Trust Score

wikipedia.org — Trustworthy. Trust Score 93/100, based on 18 user reviews, registry checks and technical data. Updated 10 Sep 2026.

Trustworthy

Confidence in this score: high — 18 reviews (14 positive, 0 negative, 4 neutral), domain age known, safe-browsing checked.

Community vote (reputation-weighted): +37

Send this check to someone about to pay: Telegram WhatsApp 🔔 Follow in Telegram Copy link

Domain dossier: wikipedia.org

Domain age

25 years (registered 13 Jan 2001)

Long-established domain.

Status

Active

The site responded at our last check on 10 Sep 2026.

Protocol

HTTPS

Traffic is encrypted.

SSL certificate

Let's Encrypt, valid until 4 Sep 2026

A certificate proves encryption, not the honesty of the operator.

Mail on the domain

Configured

Corporate mailboxes usually indicate an ongoing operation.

Hosting (IP / country)

185.15.59.224, Netherlands

Shares the server with 60 other sites — often the same operator.

Name servers

ns0.wikimedia.org,ns1.wikimedia.org

Top-level domain

.org

Safe-browsing databases

No threats found

Checked against Google Safe Browsing; a clean result does not prove good faith.

Technical data verified 10 Sep 2026; refreshed automatically by our crawler.

User reviews of wikipedia.org (18)

Positive
sebastian moulin · 2 Nov 2024

sans doute ll'un des meileur a ce jour j"en doute meme pas

Positive
Radoy Atanasov · 29 Sep 2024

depsite all what is said oon social media its reputation holds

Positive
RichardMendez · 26 Feb 2023

The hero of highscool students worldwide. These guys are great and deserve all the love in the world.

Neutral
Zaharov · 26 May 2024

Review (translated from Russian) — original in Russian, translation pending.
Сколько раз пытался там что то опубликовать вае безуспешно

Positive
losev · 6 Mar 2022

Review (translated from Russian) — original in Russian, translation pending.
очень полезный сайт, тут самая точная информация

Neutral
zibb · 4 Nov 2021

Review (translated from Russian) — original in Russian, translation pending.
Вики как идея - просто пушка. Но из-за ручной редакции любой информации многое мусор. Если бы им дали денег на персонал, на научных работников и на прочие вещи - она бы была незаменима

Showing 6 of 18 reviews. All reviews (Russian page).

Leave a review — opens the Russian page; English reviews are accepted.

How this page is built

Trust Score is TrustOrg's opinion based on the disclosed data above: the tone and volume of user reviews weighted by reviewer reputation, community votes, safe-browsing databases, regulator warning lists, domain age and owner verification. Full method: /methodology (Russian).

Registry listings are reproduced from official sources with attribution and a link to the primary record; we do not add our own accusations to them. A listing means the regulator has published a warning about the entity — it is not a court finding.

To dispute a review, a registry match or the score, or to claim this profile as the site owner, use the notice-and-action form (DSA Art. 16, reply within 48 hours) or verify ownership.

Frequently asked about wikipedia.org

Is wikipedia.org legit or a scam?

wikipedia.org currently scores 93/100 (Trustworthy) on TrustOrg. The score is an opinion based on 18 reviews, registry checks and technical data.

How many reviews does wikipedia.org have?

18 user reviews on TrustOrg: 14 positive, 0 negative, 4 neutral. 3 of them are written in English or another Latin-script language.

This page is also available in Russian. Check another website: trustorg.com.